in Perth, available now...
A breath test is when the police use a piece of equipment which requires the person being tested to blow continuously into a tube to calculate the amount of alcohol in the blood stream (also known as Blood Alcohol Content “BAC”). BAC readings are separated into different groups that will determine your charges.It is unlawful to refuse a preliminary breath test for alcohol. A preliminary breath test is usually conducted at the side of the road by police to check if there is any alcohol in your system. You will be immediately disqualified if you fail to provide sample breath test for alcohol.
If you are charged with drink driving after refusing the breath test, you should contact our office today. We can discuss the event and advise you on what your options are in relation to the charges. If you are disqualified for a long period of time, we are able to help you apply for extraordinary licence to allow you to drive provided you meet the criteria for applying.
Quick Enquiry
Private & confidential
Learn more about refusing a breath test charge in WA.
When you're ready make a quick enquiry.
FreePhone case assessment
Lets talk about your situation confidentially. We will discuss the alledged refusing a breath test in detail to understand what happened and be able to tell you if we can help or not. Get the process started now, by requesting a free call back.
Book appointment with our traffic lawyers
If it's clear consulting a solicitor you will help your situation, we can identify the right one for your case and arrange a convenient appointment for you. We will review any documents you send us, and brief the solicitor before you arrive to maximise your time with them.
In depth consultation
At your meeting the solicitor will be able to indicate the outcome they expect to achieve and the legal pathway they would take with you to ensure the best possible result based off past cases and experience. Possible defences will be explored and all of your questions answered.
Sound legal advice & pathway forward
Armed with sound legal advice and a fixed fee quote for respresentation throughout the process you can then decide if you would like them to act on your behalf to drop charges or represent you in court.
The sooner you act the better.
Leaving things to the last minute makes it more difficult for your legal team to obtain the best possible result.
Lawyers with refusing breath test experience
Meet with lawyers who have successfully defended many clients charged with refusing a breath test.
Failure To Provide Sample Of Breath
Road Traffic Act 1974 (WA)
Road Traffic Act 1974 (WA)
“A person who fails to comply with a requirement of a police officer to provide a sample of blood, urine or breathe for analysis commits an offence.”
In Plain English
Basically, if you fail to cooperate with a requirement of a police officer when they ask you to provide a breath, blood, or urine sample, or to do a driver assessment, you are committing an offence.
The sooner you act the better.
Don't let your ex dictate what you are entitled to. You have legal rights, arm yourself with knowledge before negotiating.
Lawyers with refusing breath test experience
Meet with lawyers who have successfully defended many clients charged with refusing a breath test.
If we can prove one of these defences together...
Not the driver
It is a defence to prove that the accused person was not the driver of the motor vehicle.
Was not intentional
It is a defence to prove that the driver was driving was not intentional (an accidental skid etc.). However the likelihood is that at most the charge may be downgraded to dangerous or refusing a breath test.
Duress
Where the accused commits the offence as a result of violence, threat or other pressure against the accused.
Necessity
Where the accused had to ‘necessarily’ drive carelessly to prevent some greater harm.
The sooner you act the better.
Leaving things to the last minute makes it more difficult for your legal team to obtain the best possible result.
Lawyers with refusing breath test experience
Meet with lawyers who have successfully defended many clients charged with refusing a breath test.
What’s taken into account if you’re found guilty...
First offence (No prior drink driving conviction)
Where the offender has not previously been convicted of an Excess 0.08 offence, the Court must impose a fine of not less than $900.00 and not more than $2500.00 The Court must order that the person be disqualified from holding or obtaining a drivers licence for a period of not less than 10 months.
First offence (With prior drink driving conviction)
For a first offence if the offender had previously been convicted of an Excess 0.08 offence, the Court must impose the minimum fine that would apply if the offence were committed under section 64 of the Road Traffic Act. The offender is presumed to have had blood alcohol content above 0.14g of alcohol per 100ml of blood.
First offenders will receive a minimum fine of $1600.00 and not more than $2500.00. The Court will also disqualify the person from holding or obtaining a drivers licence for a minimum of 18 months.
Subsequent offences
For any subsequent offending of this nature, the Court must impose a fine of not less than $2100.00 but not more than $5000.00. The Court may impose a term of imprisonment of up to 18 months, and must make an order that the offender be disqualified from driving permanently.
Any previous offending under section 63 of the Road Traffic Act (Driving Under the Influence – excess 0.15) shall be taken into account as a prior offence under this section.
The sooner you act the better.
Leaving things to the last minute makes it more difficult for your legal team to obtain the best possible result.
Lawyers with refusing breath test experience
Meet with lawyers who have successfully defended many clients charged with refusing a breath test.
Our Process
FreePhone case assessment
Lets talk about your situation confidentially. We will discuss the alledged refusing a breath test in detail to understand what happened and be able to tell you if we can help or not. Get the process started now, by requesting a free call back.
Book appointment with our traffic lawyers
If it's clear consulting a solicitor you will help your situation, we can identify the right one for your case and arrange a convenient appointment for you. We will review any documents you send us, and brief the solicitor before you arrive to maximise your time with them.
In depth consultation
At your meeting the solicitor will be able to indicate the outcome they expect to achieve and the legal pathway they would take with you to ensure the best possible result based off past cases and experience. Possible defences will be explored and all of your questions answered.
Sound legal advice & pathway forward
Armed with sound legal advice and a fixed fee quote for respresentation throughout the process you can then decide if you would like them to act on your behalf to drop charges or represent you in court.
The sooner you act the better.
Leaving things to the last minute makes it more difficult for your legal team to obtain the best possible result.
Lawyers with refusing breath test experience
Meet with lawyers who have successfully defended many clients charged with refusing a breath test.
The Law
Failure To Provide Sample Of Breath
Road Traffic Act 1974 (WA)
Road Traffic Act 1974 (WA)
“A person who fails to comply with a requirement of a police officer to provide a sample of blood, urine or breathe for analysis commits an offence.”
In Plain English
Basically, if you fail to cooperate with a requirement of a police officer when they ask you to provide a breath, blood, or urine sample, or to do a driver assessment, you are committing an offence.
The sooner you act the better.
Leaving things to the last minute makes it more difficult for your legal team to obtain the best possible result.
Lawyers with refusing breath test experience
Meet with lawyers who have successfully defended many clients charged with refusing a breath test.
Possible Defences
If we can prove one of these defences together...
Not the driver
It is a defence to prove that the accused person was not the driver of the motor vehicle.
Was not intentional
It is a defence to prove that the driver was driving was not intentional (an accidental skid etc.). However the likelihood is that at most the charge may be downgraded to dangerous or refusing a breath test.
Duress
Where the accused commits the offence as a result of violence, threat or other pressure against the accused.
Necessity
Where the accused had to ‘necessarily’ drive carelessly to prevent some greater harm.
The sooner you act the better.
Leaving things to the last minute makes it more difficult for your legal team to obtain the best possible result.
Lawyers with refusing breath test experience
Meet with lawyers who have successfully defended many clients charged with refusing a breath test.
Possible Outcomes
What’s taken into account if you’re found guilty...
First offence (No prior drink driving conviction)
Where the offender has not previously been convicted of an Excess 0.08 offence, the Court must impose a fine of not less than $900.00 and not more than $2500.00 The Court must order that the person be disqualified from holding or obtaining a drivers licence for a period of not less than 10 months.
First offence (With prior drink driving conviction)
For a first offence if the offender had previously been convicted of an Excess 0.08 offence, the Court must impose the minimum fine that would apply if the offence were committed under section 64 of the Road Traffic Act. The offender is presumed to have had blood alcohol content above 0.14g of alcohol per 100ml of blood.
First offenders will receive a minimum fine of $1600.00 and not more than $2500.00. The Court will also disqualify the person from holding or obtaining a drivers licence for a minimum of 18 months.
Subsequent offences
For any subsequent offending of this nature, the Court must impose a fine of not less than $2100.00 but not more than $5000.00. The Court may impose a term of imprisonment of up to 18 months, and must make an order that the offender be disqualified from driving permanently.
Any previous offending under section 63 of the Road Traffic Act (Driving Under the Influence – excess 0.15) shall be taken into account as a prior offence under this section.
The sooner you act the better.
Leaving things to the last minute makes it more difficult for your legal team to obtain the best possible result.
Lawyers with refusing breath test experience
Meet with lawyers who have successfully defended many clients charged with refusing a breath test.
If you have been charged we are sure you will have lots of questions.
Some of the most popular ones past clients ask are listed below.
Could I go to prison for failing to cooperate?
If you have previous offending of this nature, and/or offending against section 63 of the Act (Driving Under the Influence – excess 0.15), the Court has judicial discretion to impose an immediate term of imprisonment. This will depend on the accused’s driving history and the circumstances of the offence. It is best to seek legal advice as to the prospects of possible imprisonment.
What if I had a good reason?
If you had a good reason for failing to cooperate with the police, you may be able to raise defence. That said, it is still best to seek advice from a lawyer so they can look at your circumstances and advise you as to whether you would qualify for this defence.
Will I get a criminal record?
This is a traffic offence under the Road Traffic Act. You will receive a traffic record for this offence. Traffic history also shows up on a criminal record check and court history paperwork, but it is not a criminal offence.
Get the best possible outcome with our team.
Some recent outcomes are below.
Minimum Penalties – Perth Man
Perth Man walks away with minimum penalties for drink driving offence. A man charged with Driving whilst under the influence of alcohol (in excess of 0.15) walks away with a minimal fine and disqualification from driving.
Repeat Offender Avoids Jail – Perth Man
Midland Man gets the benefit of a further suspended sentence for Driving without Authority. A Midland Man who has come before the Court for No Authority to Drive on numerous occasions, walked away with a further suspended sentence after previously having been granted the benefit of the order by the Court for prior offending.
Charges Downgraded – Perth Man
Young Man charged with Reckless Driving under Hoon legislation has charges downgraded to Careless Driving. The result means the driver no longer faces a period of disqualification of his licence for the offence and his vehicle won’t be crushed.
Request call back
Book a consultation
Urgent matters